AI Creative Direction

Directing AI.
Not just prompting it.


Self-initiated campaigns built entirely with generative AI—Midjourney, Sora, and Grok Imagine—art directed from brief to final frame. The work spans invented brand identities, product photography, and campaign motion.

Role

Creative direction, art direction, visual development, prompt engineering

Tools

Midjourney · Sora · Grok Imagine · GPT-4o

Type

Self-initiated.

Project 01

Conserva

Brutalist food photography for a brand that takes product seriously.

Stills Product Brand Identity Sora

An invented lifestyle brand built around a visual language of brutalist architecture and restrained product photography. The brief to myself: make food feel monumental. No soft light, no warmth, no nostalgia — concrete, shadow, and material honesty.

Each image was directed from a creative brief, not generated speculatively. Composition, palette, and surface treatment were locked before prompting. Iterations refined the direction; they didn't discover it.

Conserva campaign — brutalist product still
Conserva campaign still
Conserva campaign still
Conserva campaign still
Conserva campaign — product detail

Creative brief

Product as architecture. Brutalist form language, no softness.

Visual references

Peter Zumthor, Tadao Ando, early Comme des Garçons lookbooks

Key decision

Palette locked to concrete, deep shadow, single warm accent before any generation.

Brief

Three adjectives: bold, expressive, architectural. The assignment was a UI project. The actual question was whether a food platform could have an opinion and hold it. Not just on the discovery screen — all the way through. Most lifestyle food brands go expressive at the top and transactional three taps in. That inconsistency is a trust problem: a user who stops believing in the curation stops using the platform. Conserva was built to test whether restraint and expressiveness could be the same design move.

Project 02

Patch Campaign, Vesper

Portrait-forward skincare campaign that doesn't flinch.

Stills Video / Motion Portrait ChatGPT Image 2.0 Grok Imagine

Skincare brands tend to erase the problem before solving it. This campaign keeps the skin visible. The invented brand is built around the idea that wearing the patch is the confident act — not hiding it.

Portraits were directed for expression first, then product placement. Motion assets used Sora for short campaign loops — 3–6 second clips intended for social placements.

Vesper campaign — portrait with visible patch
Vesper campaign — close-up still
Vesper campaign — product still
Vesper campaign — detail still

Creative brief

Confidence, not correction. The patch is visible because it's the point.

Direction approach

Expression locked per portrait before product placement was introduced in prompts.

Motion tools

Sora for campaign loops. Stills finalized in Midjourney before video reference.

Brief

The brief was this: a pimple patch worn as part of a look, not hidden under one. The audience is women in their 30s and up — not teenagers, not the self-help crowd — women who have decided that skin texture is not a problem to be solved before leaving the house. Vesper had to feel like a brand that understood this without announcing it. The visual language had to hold across two contexts: staying in on a Thursday and going out on a Saturday. The star patch is the same object in both. The campaign had to prove that.

Project 03

Thomas

Porcelain treated as architecture, not decoration.

Stills Product Brand Identity ChatGPT Image 2.0

An invented campaign for Thomas porcelain built on a single argument: objects placed with intention are already architecture. No white-box catalogue isolation — every piece sits on a surface it actually lives on, lit bright and composed like a floor plan.

The visual language refused styled excess. Disciplined colour, soft daylight, and a single object placed with the same intention a designer brings to a room. The campaign had to make the argument visually, without explaining it.

Thomas campaign — porcelain on a surface
Thomas campaign — porcelain on a surface
Thomas campaign still
Thomas campaign still
Thomas campaign still

Creative brief

Porcelain is structural, not decorative. The table treated as a floor plan.

Direction approach

Objects placed on real surfaces, never isolated against white. Bright light, disciplined colour.

Key decision

No styled excess. A single object placed with the intention a designer brings to a room.

Brief

The brief was this: Thomas porcelain is not decorative. It is structural. The problem with most tableware campaigns is that objects float — isolated against white, lit for the catalogue, removed from every surface they actually live on. Thomas had strong product and a design language worth taking seriously. The challenge was to show that a cup on a windowsill, a bowl on a shelf, a plate stacked on a counter is already a composition — already architecture. The campaign had to make that argument visually without explaining it. No styled excess, no editorial clutter. Just objects placed with the same intention a designer brings to a room. Bright light. Disciplined colour. The table treated as a floor plan.

How I Work
01

Brief before tool

Every project starts with a written creative brief: mood, palette, reference era, what the image should refuse to do. The brief constrains the generation — it doesn't follow it.

02

Visual language locked first

Palette, surface treatment, and composition logic are locked before any prompting. This prevents the tool from deciding the aesthetic direction.

03

Iteration as refinement, not discovery

Each iteration narrows toward the brief. If an output surprises me productively, I write down why and update the brief — I don't chase the accident.

04

Stills before motion

For projects with both mediums, visual language is finalized in stills before any video generation. Motion inherits the direction — it doesn't establish it.